Jesper De Jong vs Roberto Carballes Baena Head-to-Head Stats

Jesper De Jong leads the head-to-head 0–1 against Roberto Carballes Baena since 2025 across 1 meetings. Upcoming context: Cattolica (Italy) - Qualification, Final, clay court, 2026-06-14. Match odds (Pinnacle): Jesper De Jong 1.54, Roberto Carballes Baena 2.57.

Head-to-Head metrics (per match average, last 10)

  • 1st Serve In: Jong 60.9%, Baena 68.8%
  • Aces / match: Jong 9.3, Baena 2.1
  • BP Saved: Jong 63.8%, Baena 37.7%
  • BP Converted: Jong 48.5%, Baena 53.4%
  • Return Pts Won: Jong 40.3%, Baena 40.6%
  • Service Pts Won: Jong 65.3%, Baena 63.3%
  • Winners / match: Jong 37.6, Baena 19.4
  • Unforced Errors / match: Jong 28.8, Baena 20.5

Performance profile (last 10 matches average)

  • 1st serve in: Jong 60.9%, Baena 68.8%
  • aces per match: Jong 9.3, Baena 2.1
  • break points saved: Jong 63.8%, Baena 37.7%
  • break points converted: Jong 48.5%, Baena 53.4%
  • return points won: Jong 40.3%, Baena 40.6%
  • service points won: Jong 65.3%, Baena 63.3%

Match control

  • Dominance Score: Jong +5.4, Baena +2.6
  • Break Point Efficiency: Jong +12.3, Baena -8.9

Rivalry momentum

  • After 2026-03-21: Jong 0 wins, Baena 1 wins in the rivalry.

Surface breakdown

  • clay court H2H: Jong 0, Baena 1

Recent form

  • Jesper De Jong recent form (last 5 singles, 2025+): 4 wins, 1 losses — W, W, W, W, L
  • Roberto Carballes Baena recent form (last 5 singles, 2025+): 4 wins, 1 losses — W, W, W, W, L

Key rivalry stats

  • Tiebreak sets won: Jong 2, Baena 0.
  • Deciding-set wins: Jong 3, Baena 2.

Match history since 2025

Jesper De Jong vs Roberto Carballes Baena direct meetings
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceScoreWinner
2026-03-21MurciaMurcia - Semi-finalsclay6-2 4-6 4-6Roberto Carballes Baena
  • 2026-03-21 — Murcia (Murcia - Semi-finals), clay: 6-2 4-6 4-6. Winner: Roberto Carballes Baena.
26yrs
746pts
0:1

H2H since 2025 · 1 meetings

clay 01
33yrs
306pts

Head-to-Head Metrics

Per match averages · last 10 · since 2025

60.9%1st Serve In68.8%lead
lead9.3Aces / match2.1
lead63.8%BP Saved37.7%
48.5%BP Converted53.4%lead
40.3%Return Pts Won40.6%lead
lead65.3%Service Pts Won63.3%
lead37.6Winners / match19.4
lead28.8Unforced Errors / match20.5

Performance Profile

Last 10 matches avg · since 2025

JongBaena

Match Control

Pressure & control · last 10 matches · since 2025

Dominance Score

Jong
+5.4
Baena
+2.6

Break Point Efficiency

Jong
+12.3
Baena
-8.9

Form Momentum

Cumulative singles wins · last 10 · since 2025

Jong: 8WBaena: 7W

Surface Form

W–L on each court · last 10 singles · since 2025

Claytoday
82 · 73
8
7
80% A

Surface Breakdown

H2H wins by court · since 2025

Clay
1 meetings
0
1
100% B

Jong vs Baena Preview

Match Overview

Jong and Baena are set to compete in the Final of the Cattolica (Italy) - Qualification on clay. Jong, ranked 83rd, faces Baena, ranked 191st. This match is scheduled for June 14, 2026, at 16:30.

Head-to-Head History

Baena leads the head-to-head record against Jong with one win and no losses. Their only recorded meeting in the dataset was on March 21, 2026, at the Murcia Semi-finals on clay, where Baena won with a score of 6-2 4-6 4-6.

Surface Analysis

Both players have experience on clay, with Baena holding a 1-0 record on this surface in the dataset, while Jong has a 0-0 record. Their previous encounter, which Baena won, also took place on clay. Neither player has recorded wins on hard, grass, or indoor surfaces in the dataset.

Current Form

Both Jong and Baena are in strong current form, each having won 4 of their last 5 matches, resulting in an 80% win percentage for both. Jong is on a 4-match winning streak, as is Baena. Jong's last loss was to ZVEA, while Baena's last loss was to PELA.

Key Factors

  • Jong has a significantly higher Aces per match average (9.3) compared to Baena (2.1), and a higher Winners per match (37.6 vs 19.4).
  • Baena has a better first serve percentage (68.8%) than Jong (60.9%), and a higher break points converted percentage (53.4% vs 48.5%).
  • Jong has a better break points saved percentage (63.8%) compared to Baena (37.7%), but also a higher unforced errors per match (28.8 vs 20.5).