Jenson Brooksby vs Martin Damm Head-to-Head Stats

Jenson Brooksby leads the head-to-head 0–0 against Martin Damm since 2025 across 0 meetings. Upcoming context: ATP London - 1/16-finals, ATP London - 1/16-finals, grass court, 2026-06-16. Match odds (Pinnacle): Jenson Brooksby 2.26, Martin Damm 1.70.

Head-to-Head metrics (per match average, last 10)

  • 1st Serve In: Brooksby 69.9%, Damm 65.8%
  • Aces / match: Brooksby 2.1, Damm 10.4
  • BP Saved: Brooksby 39.2%, Damm 50.3%
  • BP Converted: Brooksby 26.6%, Damm 55.1%
  • Return Pts Won: Brooksby 33.4%, Damm 35.4%
  • Service Pts Won: Brooksby 56.2%, Damm 69.5%
  • Winners / match: Brooksby 20.9, Damm 32.4
  • Unforced Errors / match: Brooksby 30.5, Damm 29.4

Performance profile (last 10 matches average)

  • 1st serve in: Brooksby 69.9%, Damm 65.8%
  • aces per match: Brooksby 2.1, Damm 10.4
  • break points saved: Brooksby 39.2%, Damm 50.3%
  • break points converted: Brooksby 26.6%, Damm 55.1%
  • return points won: Brooksby 33.4%, Damm 35.4%
  • service points won: Brooksby 56.2%, Damm 69.5%

Match control

  • Dominance Score: Brooksby -5, Damm +5.4
  • Break Point Efficiency: Brooksby -34.2, Damm +5.4

Recent form

  • Jenson Brooksby recent form (last 5 singles, 2025+): 0 wins, 5 losses — L, L, L, L, L
  • Martin Damm recent form (last 5 singles, 2025+): 4 wins, 1 losses — W, W, L, W, W

Key rivalry stats

  • Tiebreak sets won: Brooksby 0, Damm 1.
  • Deciding-set wins: Brooksby 0, Damm 0.
25yrs
188cm
Righthand
817pts
0:0

H2H since 2025 · 0 meetings

22yrs
203cm
Lefthand
586pts

Head-to-Head Metrics

Per match averages · last 10 · since 2025

lead69.9%1st Serve In65.8%
2.1Aces / match10.4lead
39.2%BP Saved50.3%lead
26.6%BP Converted55.1%lead
33.4%Return Pts Won35.4%lead
56.2%Service Pts Won69.5%lead
20.9Winners / match32.4lead
lead30.5Unforced Errors / match29.4

Odds Movement

Pinnacle · 3 snapshots · pre-match

Frozen at startAll lines today
USABrooksby5.0%

Open → Now

2.382.26

Implied Δ

+2.2pp

USADamm3.7%

Open → Now

1.641.70

Implied Δ

-2.2pp

Moneyline drift

first capture → pre-match close

Brooksby · Damm

Performance Profile

Last 10 matches avg · since 2025

BrooksbyDamm

Match Control

Pressure & control · last 10 matches · since 2025

Dominance Score

Brooksby
-5
Damm
+5.4

Break Point Efficiency

Brooksby
-34.2
Damm
+5.4

Form Momentum

Cumulative singles wins · last 10 · since 2025

Brooksby: 1WDamm: 6W

Surface Form

W–L on each court · last 10 singles · since 2025

Grasstoday
01 · 63
0
6
67% B
Clay
06 · 01
0
0
even
Hard
12 · 00
1
0
33% A

Brooksby vs Damm Preview

Match Overview

This ATP London 1/16-finals match on grass will feature Jenson Brooksby and Martin Damm. Brooksby, ranked 73, is a right-handed player from the USA, while Damm, ranked 108, is a left-handed player also from the USA. Damm has a significant height advantage at 203cm compared to Brooksby's 188cm.

Head-to-Head History

This will be the first meeting between Jenson Brooksby and Martin Damm in the dataset. Neither player has recorded a win against the other in previous encounters.

Surface Analysis

Both Jenson Brooksby and Martin Damm have no recorded wins on grass in the 2025+ data window. This match will provide an opportunity for one of them to secure their first grass court victory in this period. Neither player has recorded any wins on clay, hard, or indoor surfaces in the dataset.

Current Form

Jenson Brooksby enters this match on a five-match losing streak, with no wins in his last five matches. In contrast, Martin Damm is in better form, having won four of his last five matches and currently on a two-match winning streak. Damm's recent performance includes wins against SVAZ, AGUD, MUNJ, and FICJ.

Key Factors

  • Martin Damm has a significantly higher aces per match average (10.4) compared to Jenson Brooksby (2.1).
  • Damm also leads in break points converted (55.1% vs 26.6%) and service points won (69.5% vs 56.2%).
  • Brooksby has a higher first serve percentage (69.9%) compared to Damm (65.8%), but Damm has a better break points saved percentage (50.3% vs 39.2%).